Seriously running out of ideas. You interview politicians, you interview film folks(albeit the same set ALL the effing time), you interview artists, but why would you interview ANCHORS?! Hell, they interview people. What's so big and fancy about it?! Admin, i'd appreciate it if you don't post meaningless shows like this. You're raising my hypertension.
INTERVIEWING ANCHORS DOES SEEM TO BE A GOOD IDEA. MEDIA IS FRUSTRATED TO HAVE SOME STUFF,HENCE SUCH INTERVIEWS. INTERVIEW TECHNOCRATS,ARTISTS AND EMINENT EDUCATIONISTS.WHY TO INTERVIEW PEOPLE,WHO DON'T HAVE ANY CONTRIBUTION TO ANY SPECTRUM OF SOCIETY. ANCHORS ARE JUST DOING THEIR JOB,THERE IS NOTHING TO TALK ABOUT THEM.LEAVE THEM.
hey guys! why are u soo hypertensed??? Do you think the artists(anchors, film people e.t.c)are not contributung anything for the society? well! then ur wrong my friend.
they are giving us the entertainment,to forget stress,strain,problems in our daily routine.they are contributuing in their own way to the society.
but one humble request,if u guys dont want to encourage, then u dont have the right to deiscourage.so, kindly please dont post such comments.
I didn't say they don't contribute to the society. But do we see interviews of school teachers, shoe makers, doctors or even cinematographers and movie producers? We don't. So why anchors/news readers? Just because we see them on tv? Big furry deal. 2 years into their job, suddenly they're acquire celebrity status, is it? They don't even say anything interesting. Another drab, boring program to kill air time.
when there are many eminent people,whom the media never thought of bringing before camera,certain doctors who render free or for very less,popular stage artists,craftsmen and teachers. why anchors?they are there before camera always.why again for no reason. i came to know about a doctor in tirupati who takes care of patients in a sympathetic way irrespective of their background,specially the poor.if media gives focus on such people,their message may inspire other doctors also to render such service. i don't have any ill feeling for anchors.
18 comments:
Seriously running out of ideas. You interview politicians, you interview film folks(albeit the same set ALL the effing time), you interview artists, but why would you interview ANCHORS?! Hell, they interview people. What's so big and fancy about it?! Admin, i'd appreciate it if you don't post meaningless shows like this. You're raising my hypertension.
INTERVIEWING ANCHORS DOES SEEM TO BE A GOOD IDEA.
MEDIA IS FRUSTRATED TO HAVE SOME STUFF,HENCE SUCH INTERVIEWS.
INTERVIEW TECHNOCRATS,ARTISTS AND EMINENT EDUCATIONISTS.WHY TO INTERVIEW PEOPLE,WHO DON'T HAVE ANY CONTRIBUTION TO ANY SPECTRUM OF SOCIETY.
ANCHORS ARE JUST DOING THEIR JOB,THERE IS NOTHING TO TALK ABOUT THEM.LEAVE THEM.
hey guys!
why are u soo hypertensed???
Do you think the artists(anchors, film people e.t.c)are not contributung anything for the society? well! then ur wrong my friend.
they are giving us the entertainment,to forget stress,strain,problems in our daily routine.they are contributuing in their own way to the society.
but one humble request,if u guys dont want to encourage, then u dont have the right to deiscourage.so, kindly please dont post such comments.
I didn't say they don't contribute to the society. But do we see interviews of school teachers, shoe makers, doctors or even cinematographers and movie producers? We don't. So why anchors/news readers? Just because we see them on tv? Big furry deal. 2 years into their job, suddenly they're acquire celebrity status, is it? They don't even say anything interesting. Another drab, boring program to kill air time.
she slept with me - lol - I can't believe that she is being interviewed - seriously guys don't you have better people to interview
Program is good it's nice to know about the other side of television media people.It's good for a change.
when there are many eminent people,whom the media never thought of bringing before camera,certain doctors who render free or for very less,popular stage artists,craftsmen and teachers.
why anchors?they are there before camera always.why again for no reason.
i came to know about a doctor in tirupati who takes care of patients in a sympathetic way irrespective of their background,specially the poor.if media gives focus on such people,their message may inspire other doctors also to render such service.
i don't have any ill feeling for anchors.
Who the f****k she ?
some crap
I think she is grand daughter of director bapu
who the F*** is she?
poor karthik's love is unexpressed, i feel or one sided
telugu matladachu kada.. ee English style ekkuva ayyindi andariki..
telugu matladachu kada.. ee English style ekkuva ayyindi andariki..
@6.22PM who is this karthik???
Post a Comment
Following are prohibited:
1) Hatred messages on a community/person
2) Abusive/Filthy language.
3) Messages unrelated to the post.