I diagree about your coments on directors' capacity in taking a film. However I agree that directors are blaming way too much on the reviewers. Yes I do agree that some reviewers have been changed their quality of reviewing but I don't think the reviewers have gotten to the point where they down grade the movie for money. So if the movie is good, directors don't have to worry too much about the reviewers.I was really surprised to see good directors like rajamouli and Krishna vamsi to give an immature comment!
thats true that if movie is worth watching nobody can write its fate. if movie is not even if the reviews are good on the movie nobody will watch the movie.its only bull shit on theatre reviews where we watch on tv people saying great movie fantastic. then why the movies are flopping.........its not on reviews on internet i could genuinly feel reviews on internet are fare......
Yes, I do agree that the site reviews are not always correct, they may be baised based on caste, community or money, but why these celebrities promot their films irrespective of quality the movie??? and also why do they give money to the theaters to screen their movies even they are not doing well?
The point is a good movie can never be down graded by these reviews for sure!!!
It is not reviewers that are causing major damage to the industry, the piracy and the web site that are posting links to the newly released movies!!! track them and punish them.
13 comments:
I have one question for directors..
why do you think that ppl are believing in those reviews?
Meeru cinemalu sarigga teeste, review correct gane padatai.
bokkalo cinemali teesi janala meedaku vadalatam malli reviews vallu fair ga leru ani bhoru mani edvatam.
hypocrisy at its peak
intellectual cheap fellows becomes directors and want the entire soceity to stoop to their (low) level
cheap bas tards
I diagree about your coments on directors' capacity in taking a film. However I agree that directors are blaming way too much on the reviewers. Yes I do agree that some reviewers have been changed their quality of reviewing but I don't think the reviewers have gotten to the point where they down grade the movie for money. So if the movie is good, directors don't have to worry too much about the reviewers.I was really surprised to see good directors like rajamouli and Krishna vamsi to give an immature comment!
thats true that if movie is worth watching nobody can write its fate. if movie is not even if the reviews are good on the movie nobody will watch the movie.its only bull shit on theatre reviews where we watch on tv people saying great movie fantastic. then why the movies are flopping.........its not on reviews on internet i could genuinly feel reviews on internet are fare......
Yes, I do agree that the site reviews are not always correct, they may be baised based on caste, community or money, but why these celebrities promot their films irrespective of quality the movie??? and also why do they give money to the theaters to screen their movies even they are not doing well?
The point is a good movie can never be down graded by these reviews for sure!!!
It is not reviewers that are causing major damage to the industry, the piracy and the web site that are posting links to the newly released movies!!! track them and punish them.
ya vindu bojanam petteppudu kukkalu egabaduthunnay adi correct..manam padese dabulu kosam directors producers egabadthunattu..
they gave 3.5 rating for magadheera.do u think its satisfied?it was 5 star movie...
so what diff did it make if they gave a bad review..it got what it ought to get .. so mari reviews meeda padi edavatam endhuku..
join with my referral please http://OpinionOutpost.com/join/7831921
Directors reacting to the review indicates that reviewers are doing a good job. How else the viewers decide whether the money spent is its worth?
babu 1:56... 5 star ante andariki nacchali... naaku nacchaledu... also I know ppl who didn't like it at all... 4 ivvacchu may be..
magadheer ki 3.5 ekkuve !!! 2.5 to 3 enough
Post a Comment
Following are prohibited:
1) Hatred messages on a community/person
2) Abusive/Filthy language.
3) Messages unrelated to the post.