orey piccha nakodaka RK nuvvu oka debate lo yelavundalo neeku thelusaa, nuvvu assalu journalism nerchukunnavaa journalism thelusaa picchi nakoduku laga aa navventiraa...paniki malina picchi nayala.... orey nuvvu eppudu jagan ki against ga yenduku debates peduthunnavu. kaneesam TV9 ravi prakash ni choodu kontha dignity vundaliraa
@6:18PM I wish you know how to write decent comments (practice what you preach). I am not a supporter of ABN but I failed to understand your logic in connecting RK's being against Jagana and journalism. Journalistic abilities of a particular person depends on the kind of questions they ask or news analysis they do and not just merely the way they ask or analyse. For example, Jeremy Paxman (JP) in a well known news reader in BBC and you will shock the way he asks the question. Once he famously asked one of the minister in John Major (he was PM in early 90's after Marget Thacher) cabinet the same question 18 times until he got the kind of answer he wanted. Off course, there are other reporters in the same organisation who are as good as JP but their style of functioning is different. So we cann't judge the quality of journalism based on the way the questions were posed but it can be judged based on the questions asked. I would say RK is far better than many telugu TV presenters. Also he asked Undavalli appropriate questions. The take home message from that debate is if Jagan and his family had any doubts of YSR's death why didn't they raise them before when they had plenty of opportunities do so.
It seems u r not much familiar with AP cast and revenge based media politics....Here the main ABN agenda is against Jagan no matter what the truth is. consider few examples here
1. Jagan has 75 rooms palace (Jagan and his party members challenged him to carry his camera to inside of his house and they never took up the challenge. They just do the negative advertize for jagan.
In yellow media it, Jagan's house often refers as palace and they forget about Ramoji's bullet proof palace on a hill in ramoji film city and they don't talk about it. Ramoji film city is a kabja place.
Here the 2nd case, Gali janadhan reddy has a "bangaaru simhasanam". In today's news (Not in yellow media)that CBI found it is guilty one (has only 14 karats gold coating)...but the yellow media advertized it is made up of around 200 kgs of gold. What do u think this is called journalism....if I want to list out the points what Eenadu / ABN / TV9 doing and their corruption, land kabjas and how they become multi billioneers in media sector over nights....!!!! then this blog would probably go out of memory issue..
@12:25 PM I am not agreeing or disagreeing with @6.18PM, what I merely saying (s)he can say what (s)he wants to say using decent language. I am neither Reddy nor Kamma but born and brought up in AP and studied in a college with Kamma management so I know about caste politics. This doesn't mean I will use gutter language against people whom I disagree with and try to justify it using caste differences. Unlike Ramoji Rao, Jagan wants to be in politics so we cann't compare Jagan with Ramoji Rao. Here the question is did Jagan earned crores by misusing his father's position or not? Also if Ramoji Rao acquired his monies illegally, then there is no wrong in asking for his arrest but supporting Jagan illegal activities because other's also guilty make no sense. Because two wrongs don't make a right.
I have seen Eenadu and Sakshi and unfortunately I have to say Sakshi is very close to be called as Propaganda channel and only channel worst than that is kachara's channel.
eadava kathalu cheppodu basu..evadaina kashtapadi tintaru..akkaadiki nuvvedo kshtapadi mee chuttupakkala janalni poshisthunatlu cheptunavuga.. Wht he was trying to say is..Why this SHIT RK..select PPL who say agnst Jagan !!!!..Why not PPL who say agnst CBN and Ramoji..
Tamari cheema brain ki intha detail ga chepete gaani ardam avadaa..leka tamaru chuttu pakkala vaallani poshinchatam lo busy vunnaraa..
@4:05PM "Wht he was trying to say is..Why this SHIT RK..select PPL who say agnst Jagan !!!!..Why not PPL who say agnst CBN and Ramoji.."
Undavalli took Ramoji Rao to court and it is well known. It is unfortunate that you don't know this simple thing. However, the big debate was about YSR's chopper crash so because of that they didn't discussed about Ramoji Rao issue here. The question is whether Jagan is innocent or guilty. If he is innocent why don't you say so rather than accusing someone else of doing the same. Let's assume that Ramaji Rao is guilty and how mentioning this would make Jagan innocent?
@11:45 I know Jeremy Dickson Paxman.I have been here for the last 10 years(U.K).It is not the question of J.P.I was much concerned about the way he is laughing.He should mind the intensity of debate.If you think that R.K is better among the presenters it shows how innocent you are.Once again Go and watch the video, he is laughing like mentally disabled.I am not talking in favour of Jagan , but when he is conducting debate on such a serious topic his behaviour should not irritate the viewers.I can leave very decent comments. I was compelled to use such vulgar language you can understand to what extent his behaviour led me to.If you know about J.P it doesn't mean that he is number 1 even i know the world famous journalist "WALTER CRONKITE".If you have time please go through his history.
@1:54PM I really failed to understand your logic in using abusive language. Undavalli is still had cases against Ramoji Rao in court, which he mentioned in recent interviews where it is related. The topic of this debate was YSR's chopper crash and how Jagan and his family using YSR's death for their political gain. Therefore I failed to understand your logic of why they don't discuss about all other bad things happening in whole world in that debate.
Jagan earned a huge amount of money during his father regime and there is evidence to suggest he did so by illegal means. He has no political experience, no evidence of strongly supporting his father policies such as jalayagnam and keeping AP united, earned thousands of crores by using his father's position and his name as associated with some political murders. These qualities of Jagan clearly illustrate what he would do if he comes into power. AP is already in chaos and if Jagan come to power then even God cann't help AP.
@9:10PM I am glad to know that you have been living in the UK for a decade but the kind of language you used clearly illustrates you didn't loose your Indian touch. In one of my comments (@11.45PM) I said Jeremy Paxaman is a well known presenter (never said he is number 1) though the way he asks questions shocking. So we cann't judge journalism merely based on how questions being asked instead it should be based on what kind of questions being asked. RK did ask appropriate questions in that debate though you didn't like his laugh. So how can you say it is bad journalism. Also the language you used to explain your anger against RK in your first comment (I am glad it has been removed by administrator) is unjustified and unwarranted.
Well.. the debate is not about RK or his presentation of the program. It is definitely a good debate and Undavalli Arun Kumar, who never speak non sense, absolutely explained what YSR congress is gaining from raising some irrelevant issue at this point.
@1.54 or People here who strongly support Jagan (or YSR Congress), Could you please explain why people have to vote from him or his party? Are you not supporting a person who has serious allegations of laundering public money? My question is not about why people has to vote for Congress or TDP or any other party, it is simple.. why somebody has to vote for YSR Congress? I expect any responsible citizen of this country should not vote for such person with serious criminal offences until he is proved not guilty.. as simple as that!
It is most unfortunate that even educated people are supporting Jagan. He looted money and his supporters asking to arrest all other guilty in whole world before arresting him but they never say he is innocent. If he could bled to dry the AP state funds without being in power, imagine what he would do if he come to power.
Even his cheating public with his party name YSR (means yuvagena sraakima raithu and not YS RajasekharReddy) congress party.
Recently his family members fooling public saying they have doubts about YSR's death but never bothered to ask for enquires. If it is not for political gaining what it is for.
19 comments:
orey piccha nakodaka RK nuvvu oka debate lo yelavundalo neeku thelusaa, nuvvu assalu journalism nerchukunnavaa journalism thelusaa
picchi nakoduku laga aa navventiraa...paniki malina picchi nayala.... orey nuvvu eppudu jagan ki against ga yenduku debates peduthunnavu. kaneesam TV9 ravi prakash ni choodu kontha dignity vundaliraa
@6:18PM
I wish you know how to write decent comments (practice what you preach).
I am not a supporter of ABN but I failed to understand your logic in connecting RK's being against Jagana and journalism.
Journalistic abilities of a particular person depends on the kind of questions they ask or news analysis they do and not just merely the way they ask or analyse. For example, Jeremy Paxman (JP) in a well known news reader in BBC and you will shock the way he asks the question. Once he famously asked one of the minister in John Major (he was PM in early 90's after Marget Thacher) cabinet the same question 18 times until he got the kind of answer he wanted. Off course, there are other reporters in the same organisation who are as good as JP but their style of functioning is different. So we cann't judge the quality of journalism based on the way the questions were posed but it can be judged based on the questions asked.
I would say RK is far better than many telugu TV presenters. Also he asked Undavalli appropriate questions. The take home message from that debate is if Jagan and his family had any doubts of YSR's death why didn't they raise them before when they had plenty of opportunities do so.
@11.45,
It seems u r not much familiar with AP cast and revenge based media politics....Here the main ABN agenda is against Jagan no matter what the truth is. consider few examples here
1. Jagan has 75 rooms palace (Jagan and his party members challenged him to carry his camera to inside of his house and they never took up the challenge. They just do the negative advertize for jagan.
In yellow media it, Jagan's house often refers as palace and they forget about Ramoji's bullet proof palace on a hill in ramoji film city and they don't talk about it. Ramoji film city is a kabja place.
Here the 2nd case, Gali janadhan reddy has a "bangaaru simhasanam". In today's news (Not in yellow media)that CBI found it is guilty one (has only 14 karats gold coating)...but the yellow media advertized it is made up of around 200 kgs of gold. What do u think this is called journalism....if I want to list out the points what Eenadu / ABN / TV9 doing and their corruption, land kabjas and how they become multi billioneers in media sector over nights....!!!!
then this blog would probably go out of memory issue..
12:25 PM you forgot to mention your most 'ethical' channel sakshi.
If you still believe jagan and gali are not corrupt god help you!
@12:25PM master meeru roju annam tintunnara inkedanna tintunnara , nenu aithe kastapadina dabbuthone annam tintunna anduke Jagan ni eppatiki samardhinchanu. Jagan ni samardhinchanu ante nenu TDP ano congress ano kadu , ilanti daridrapu sampadana evadu chesina samardhinchanu, meeru kuda annam tintunte dayachesi samrdhinchadhu.
@12:25 PM
I am not agreeing or disagreeing with @6.18PM, what I merely saying (s)he can say what (s)he wants to say using decent language.
I am neither Reddy nor Kamma but born and brought up in AP and studied in a college with Kamma management so I know about caste politics. This doesn't mean I will use gutter language against people whom I disagree with and try to justify it using caste differences.
Unlike Ramoji Rao, Jagan wants to be in politics so we cann't compare Jagan with Ramoji Rao. Here the question is did Jagan earned crores by misusing his father's position or not? Also if Ramoji Rao acquired his monies illegally, then there is no wrong in asking for his arrest but supporting Jagan illegal activities because other's also guilty make no sense. Because two wrongs don't make a right.
I have seen Eenadu and Sakshi and unfortunately I have to say Sakshi is very close to be called as Propaganda channel and only channel worst than that is kachara's channel.
@2:19 PM..
eadava kathalu cheppodu basu..evadaina kashtapadi tintaru..akkaadiki nuvvedo kshtapadi mee chuttupakkala janalni poshisthunatlu cheptunavuga..
Wht he was trying to say is..Why this SHIT RK..select PPL who say agnst Jagan !!!!..Why not PPL who say agnst CBN and Ramoji..
Tamari cheema brain ki intha detail ga chepete gaani ardam avadaa..leka tamaru chuttu pakkala vaallani poshinchatam lo busy vunnaraa..
@4:05PM
"Wht he was trying to say is..Why this SHIT RK..select PPL who say agnst Jagan !!!!..Why not PPL who say agnst CBN and Ramoji.."
Undavalli took Ramoji Rao to court and it is well known. It is unfortunate that you don't know this simple thing. However, the big debate was about YSR's chopper crash so because of that they didn't discussed about Ramoji Rao issue here.
The question is whether Jagan is innocent or guilty. If he is innocent why don't you say so rather than accusing someone else of doing the same. Let's assume that Ramaji Rao is guilty and how mentioning this would make Jagan innocent?
Jagan is criminal..see his smial..he is dangerouss than terrorist also....
orey babu @6:56 P:M smial kaadu SMILE.......
@11:45 I know Jeremy Dickson Paxman.I have been here for the last 10 years(U.K).It is not the question of J.P.I was much concerned about the way he is laughing.He should mind the intensity of debate.If you think that R.K is better among the presenters it shows how innocent you are.Once again Go and watch the video, he is laughing like mentally disabled.I am not talking in favour of Jagan , but when he is conducting debate on such a serious topic his behaviour should not irritate the viewers.I can leave very decent comments. I was compelled to use such vulgar language you can understand to what extent his behaviour led me to.If you know about J.P it doesn't mean that he is number 1 even i know the world famous journalist "WALTER CRONKITE".If you have time please go through his history.
@4:21 PM..
once again there you are..
here the debate is not the point why this Shit-eater RK, gathering PPL who talk agnst YSR and Jagan..
And Undavalli case agnst Ramoji is past !! now a small scholl kid can realize how this TDP media and Cong. are moving with hand in Hand..
@6:56 PM..
orey..neeeku lopala chala Kullu..Manta ga vundi..Jagan gaadi growth choosthe..Adi ikkada kakkeyali..Bayata yemi peekalevu..yemi ane dammu ledu..andukena ikkada musugu lo ee statements..!!!! LOLZ.......
1.54 nuvvendira ysr//jagan di baga chiikinaava. Reddy/Christian tappithe yevadu vadiki support cheyadu.
Neeku Dammunte Lok satta ki vote veyi
@1:54PM
I really failed to understand your logic in using abusive language.
Undavalli is still had cases against Ramoji Rao in court, which he mentioned in recent interviews where it is related.
The topic of this debate was YSR's chopper crash and how Jagan and his family using YSR's death for their political gain. Therefore I failed to understand your logic of why they don't discuss about all other bad things happening in whole world in that debate.
Jagan earned a huge amount of money during his father regime and there is evidence to suggest he did so by illegal means. He has no political experience, no evidence of strongly supporting his father policies such as jalayagnam and keeping AP united, earned thousands of crores by using his father's position and his name as associated with some political murders. These qualities of Jagan clearly illustrate what he would do if he comes into power. AP is already in chaos and if Jagan come to power then even God cann't help AP.
@9:10PM
I am glad to know that you have been living in the UK for a decade but the kind of language you used clearly illustrates you didn't loose your Indian touch.
In one of my comments (@11.45PM) I said Jeremy Paxaman is a well known presenter (never said he is number 1) though the way he asks questions shocking. So we cann't judge journalism merely based on how questions being asked instead it should be based on what kind of questions being asked. RK did ask appropriate questions in that debate though you didn't like his laugh. So how can you say it is bad journalism. Also the language you used to explain your anger against RK in your first comment (I am glad it has been removed by administrator) is unjustified and unwarranted.
Well.. the debate is not about RK or his presentation of the program. It is definitely a good debate and Undavalli Arun Kumar, who never speak non sense, absolutely explained what YSR congress is gaining from raising some irrelevant issue at this point.
@1.54 or People here who strongly support Jagan (or YSR Congress), Could you please explain why people have to vote from him or his party? Are you not supporting a person who has serious allegations of laundering public money? My question is not about why people has to vote for Congress or TDP or any other party, it is simple.. why somebody has to vote for YSR Congress? I expect any responsible citizen of this country should not vote for such person with serious criminal offences until he is proved not guilty.. as simple as that!
@6:36AM
Well said
It is most unfortunate that even educated people are supporting Jagan. He looted money and his supporters asking to arrest all other guilty in whole world before arresting him but they never say he is innocent. If he could bled to dry the AP state funds without being in power, imagine what he would do if he come to power.
Even his cheating public with his party name YSR (means yuvagena sraakima raithu and not YS RajasekharReddy) congress party.
Recently his family members fooling public saying they have doubts about YSR's death but never bothered to ask for enquires. If it is not for political gaining what it is for.
Post a Comment