there is nothing wrong in taking help of surrogacy if she is unable to become a mother because of any medical problem. it is her own baby that is grown in another woman`s womb.
You guys need to do your research. Becoming a surrogate mother does not mean she cannot have children of her own. It means that she's acting as a surrogate for someone else. Through the process of in-vitro fertilization, she will carry the embryo and grow it for the gestation period until the baby is born. So the child will not genetically be hers. She's helping someone who cannot naturally have a child. Such negativity on this site...
no some one bore the embryo of her and her husband, so her baby is grown in somebody else uterus, but the baby is born with genetic feature of her and her husband, only womb is not hers. so she is the actual mother of the child, thats what surrogacy means. the above comments shows the negativity and ignorance of some people. surrogacy is a boon for women who have some structural problems or mediacal reasons for women who cannot carry their child.already in INDIA this trend has started, but since this is celebrity issue, so media is highlighting.
Surrogacy is a great revolution in human history. Meelo evarikaina (ladies/gents) pillalu putte yogam lekapothe telusthadhi. There is nothing wrong in it. May be she has problem or she didn't want to give birth... either way that's fine. Poorva kalam lo vari pandichaleni vadni kooda ilage thitte vallata, ippudu evaru pandisthunnaru cheppandi
The title of this is misleading. She is not the surrogate mother if she's not having the child. The person who had the child for her is the actual surrogate mother (if that is the case). Why are people confusing these things? The surrogate mother is the one that bears the child in place of the mother. She is not the genetic parent. So either manchu is the surrogate mother- meaning she is having someone else's child for them or she opted for surrogacy- meaning someone else had the child for her. So, 11:56 your point is invalid.
13 comments:
deeniki em rogam
who is the real mother for that child?
she is the mother..baby grows in some other persons womb
how can she be mother, she has not given birth.
there is nothing wrong in taking help of surrogacy if she is unable to become a mother because of any medical problem. it is her own baby that is grown in another woman`s womb.
yaah thoooo nee mokham meeda kaki retteyya.
You guys need to do your research. Becoming a surrogate mother does not mean she cannot have children of her own. It means that she's acting as a surrogate for someone else. Through the process of in-vitro fertilization, she will carry the embryo and grow it for the gestation period until the baby is born. So the child will not genetically be hers. She's helping someone who cannot naturally have a child. Such negativity on this site...
no some one bore the embryo of her and her husband, so her baby is grown in somebody else uterus, but the baby is born with genetic feature of her and her husband, only womb is not hers. so she is the actual mother of the child, thats what surrogacy means. the above comments shows the negativity and ignorance of some people. surrogacy is a boon for women who have some structural problems or mediacal reasons for women who cannot carry their child.already in INDIA this trend has started, but since this is celebrity issue, so media is highlighting.
According to me this is not news at all... this is something that their personal matters.. Why media is publishing this..?
Media na kodukuliki,, vere paniledhu.. tho... Yahdava na kodukulu..
If Media has guts.. go and publish. CBN, KCR Jagan s are looting so much of peoples money.. do something on it..
Sreedevi Cheera katindhi... Roja koka vipindhi.. e news oka news ne raaa Yadhava..
Surrogacy is a great revolution in human history. Meelo evarikaina (ladies/gents) pillalu putte yogam lekapothe telusthadhi. There is nothing wrong in it. May be she has problem or she didn't want to give birth... either way that's fine.
Poorva kalam lo vari pandichaleni vadni kooda ilage thitte vallata, ippudu evaru pandisthunnaru cheppandi
i dont think she has any problem, she does nt want waste her time/pain in the process.
The title of this is misleading. She is not the surrogate mother if she's not having the child. The person who had the child for her is the actual surrogate mother (if that is the case). Why are people confusing these things? The surrogate mother is the one that bears the child in place of the mother. She is not the genetic parent. So either manchu is the surrogate mother- meaning she is having someone else's child for them or she opted for surrogacy- meaning someone else had the child for her. So, 11:56 your point is invalid.
I don't know people alwayssss bothers about others..this is her life and her decision..why media makes a big issue ...
Post a Comment