same as it is copy from aptarakshaka(kannad)anushka chala aged ga vundi.nagavalli ga asalu ematram set kaledu.classical dancer konchem kuda anipinchaledu.kaamlini action better..as a doctor ga venky action lo kuda seriousness ledu..climax was very simple.
While, I was watching anushka's episode in the movie.. I deeply felt sorry for not having a telugu actor like Bhanupriya. If anushka knows classical dance, she would rock such character. I felt the same when I was watching Pournami. Trisha, Charmi were sooo dumb with classical dance and PrbhuDeva had depand on camera angles where he doesnt show the dance but the temple set.
I pity telugu industry for not having a dancer like bhanu priya or jaya prada.. etc..
anushka was looking like a guy, and rich what a load of crappy performance, they are beautiful in some angles, thatz all. zilch of acting skills, same is true with venky. no matter what type of role he does, same mannerism, same histrionics...
Chi chatta cinema. They made Anushka look so ugly and her role in the movie was not defined at all. Venkatesh ki raja role assalu suit avvaledu. Cannot compare with original chandramukhi.
hey its not 27..its 35 people now..richa is too bad in this movie..i suppose kamalani should do dat role instead richa..in some scenes anushka's expressions r nice..but dance is not gud..
Agreed that she also admits it that she can't dance and is learning. One can't be a Bhanupriya,Jayaprada or Shobana overnight.
But we see our heroes do not admit their weakness and they claim as all-in-one superheores because fans n media are following them.Look at Prabhas,Mahesh,Charan,Venky,Nag,Balaya as they can't even act properly.
@2:41 prabhas,mahesh,charan,venky,nag,balaya veelaki acting radaaa...vallaki training kavalanta neelanti valla nunchi..so that they can make better movies than chatrapati,pokiri,magadeera e.t.c maaku e movies lo valla action good anipinchindi. mari nee expectation entooo... comment box pettaru kada ani edi vaste adi rayaku anna..relavent ga vundave rayi...
This movie is kind of waste. It can only be watched for a little comedy but nothing. 1) What is new in the story to be called as sequel? Same type of followups and remembering rajani kanth in between. It shows that the storyline is weak. 2) Venky is good as the psychriatrist but is not upto the mark as the king. He is ok in some serious dialogs as king, but sometimes he looks funny. 3)The scenes in the king's time are not shown in legendary style. You can see venky's commander shouts "ooy" in front of the king to call the soldiers. His action is a big minus for that scene. Has the director even considered about how people behave in the presence of kings? 4)The key scene of Richa turning into Chandramukhi is totally spoiled. I would like to tie the director of the movie to a chair and show the dialog "nenem chesanu..nenu paapam chesanu" a million times. She was going good with the scary expression but suddenly when she lost chandramukhi, her dialogs turn just into crap. The dialog writer and director can be called suckers for their mistakes in the key scene. Has no one observed it in their review shows? 5) The snake is a waste of money to the graphics unit. If he shows it in first scene (as per necessity), its ok. but the poor creature has no role other than it. come on what is it ? Nagini in harry potter? ha ha.
6) last but not least, the director shows as if all the women are psychos of chandramukhi. one women gets chandramukhi's painting, another want to draw it (other than that, all she can do is to give scary looks all the time), and one woman becomes chandramukhi. Whey the f**k every gal is interested in chandramukhi's story? its because director is an idiot.
21 comments:
same as it is copy from aptarakshaka(kannad)anushka chala aged ga vundi.nagavalli ga asalu ematram set kaledu.classical dancer konchem kuda anipinchaledu.kaamlini action better..as a doctor ga venky action lo kuda seriousness ledu..climax was very simple.
chetha cinema. Anushga aaadapilla laaga ledhu, magarayudi laaga undhi. dance raadhu,cinema antha okey expression. nagavalli role kamilini ki ivvalsindhi. Richa performance the worst in climax. assalu richa ni enduku thesukunnaro ee movie lo ardham kaadhu...chi! Richa personality ki dance raadhu, chandramukhi laaga action kooda cheyyatam raadhu. THALANOPPI CINEMA.
While, I was watching anushka's episode in the movie.. I deeply felt sorry for not having a telugu actor like Bhanupriya. If anushka knows classical dance, she would rock such character. I felt the same when I was watching Pournami. Trisha, Charmi were sooo dumb with classical dance and PrbhuDeva had depand on camera angles where he doesnt show the dance but the temple set.
I pity telugu industry for not having a dancer like bhanu priya or jaya prada.. etc..
i agree with both 4.04pm, and 7.26pm.
anushka was looking like a guy, and rich what a load of crappy performance, they are beautiful in some angles, thatz all. zilch of acting skills, same is true with venky. no matter what type of role he does, same mannerism, same histrionics...
totally bakwas movie.
I felt the same, Bro with the classical dance appeal.
Bhanupriya was outstanding in the old films and it's hard to get one now.
Bad movie. Direction was really bad. Performance of artists was mediocre. Can be called a third grade remake of chandramukhi.
avunu classical dance asalu raani vallani petti ilanti cinemaa teesthe ilaane vuntundi. Kamalini gaani, shriya ayinaa gaani bagundedi , vallu classical dance vachina vallu, Anushka, Richa assalu suit avvaledu. Jyothika ki classical dance raakapoyinaa chala baga chesindi...
Anushka TV interviews lo chala baguntondi, mari movies lo enduku alaa vuntondi, some thing wrong with makeup,and camera
chi!assalu bagoledu movie.mari hit ani baita enduku antunnaru
Waste movie, waste of time. No value for the siddhanthi (like in original movie). No seriousness. weak story, weak climax, antha sillaga tisaru.
Chi chatta cinema. They made Anushka look so ugly and her role in the movie was not defined at all. Venkatesh ki raja role assalu suit avvaledu. Cannot compare with original chandramukhi.
Is it a sequel? Worst remake of Chandramukhi...lot worse than Bhool bhulayya...
27 people liked it..I wonder how
hey its not 27..its 35 people now..richa is too bad in this movie..i suppose kamalani should do dat role instead richa..in some scenes anushka's expressions r nice..but dance is not gud..
don't compare this with the original one...It's not that bad for as it is a straight Telugu movie...watch it in theater you will get the effects
from 10:33
I do agree anushka's dancing is big minus to this film.
Agreed that she also admits it that she can't dance and is learning. One
can't be a Bhanupriya,Jayaprada or Shobana overnight.
But we see our heroes do not admit their weakness and they claim as all-in-one superheores because fans
n media are following them.Look at
Prabhas,Mahesh,Charan,Venky,Nag,Balaya
as they can't even act properly.
@2:41 prabhas,mahesh,charan,venky,nag,balaya veelaki acting radaaa...vallaki training kavalanta neelanti valla nunchi..so that they can make better movies than chatrapati,pokiri,magadeera e.t.c
maaku e movies lo valla action good anipinchindi. mari nee expectation entooo... comment box pettaru kada ani edi vaste adi rayaku anna..relavent ga vundave rayi...
This movie is kind of waste. It can only be watched for a little comedy but nothing.
1) What is new in the story to be called as sequel? Same type of followups and remembering rajani kanth in between. It shows that the storyline is weak.
2) Venky is good as the psychriatrist but is not upto the mark as the king. He is ok in some serious dialogs as king, but sometimes he looks funny.
3)The scenes in the king's time are not shown in legendary style. You can see venky's commander shouts "ooy" in front of the king to call the soldiers. His action is a big minus for that scene. Has the director even considered about how people behave in the presence of kings?
4)The key scene of Richa turning into Chandramukhi is totally spoiled. I would like to tie the director of the movie to a chair and show the dialog "nenem chesanu..nenu paapam chesanu" a million times. She was going good with the scary expression but suddenly when she lost chandramukhi, her dialogs turn just into crap. The dialog writer and director can be called suckers for their mistakes in the key scene. Has no one observed it in their review shows?
5) The snake is a waste of money to the graphics unit. If he shows it in first scene (as per necessity), its ok. but the poor creature has no role other than it. come on what is it ? Nagini in harry potter? ha ha.
6) last but not least, the director shows as if all the women are psychos of chandramukhi. one women gets chandramukhi's painting, another want to draw it (other than that, all she can do is to give scary looks all the time), and one woman becomes chandramukhi. Whey the f**k every gal is interested in chandramukhi's story? its because director is an idiot.
I pity telugu industry for not having a dancer like bhanu priya or jaya prada.. etc..
khaadi eid collection 2021 stitched
khaadi stitched suits
Post a Comment