The majority in AP has become self destructive and want to go back to the stage when no one knows about telugu or AP. This is the reason why people are supporting regionalism (without know what it is for) or someone because his father did something to state. People acquire certain talent (education, political survival etc) through experience and it cann't be passed through genetics. So people should stop believing in regionalism and heredity politics.
@11.30AM Everybody know the Telugu and AP true colors that's why supporting regionalism. If everybody treats every region as the same this won't happen but Andhra true colors showed every where and before AP formation and after AP formation.
@1:00PM, There is no difference between your accusations and Nazi's accusing Jews for difficulties in Germany during 2nd world war.
People who male their own language and state as laughing stock are no different from the guys who talk bad about their loved ones.
There is no state of AP size in India with uniform development and therefore it is quite inappropriate to use under development as the basis for regionalism. In fact, Rayalaseema is the least developed in AP though majority of CMs, including the recent and most powerful CMs, come from that region. This indicate there is no logic in using under development and self rule as the reasons for current agitation in AP.
It is well known fact is that people who have no confidence in themselves blame others for their failures whether it make sense or not. The regional development depends on the local politicians if there are not good why you are supporting them just because they changed their party.
If there is no sense in regionalism, why did you people separate from Tamilnadu. If you say that it was formed on linguistic basis then that is biggest threat to indian union. No need to say, some one might ask separate country on linguistic basis in the future. So, per your logic, Seemandhra should go and merge back in Tamilnadu where as Telangana, Marathwada and some districts from karnataka would go back and form a hyderabad state which as it was. So, then there wouldn't be any regionalism...
kya dimak ka dahi karrehien reh..
do you have any sense and logic in your previous argument....don't give too much strain to your brain brother...have some discussion with your ex brothers i.e., tamilians while you are having some coffee or tea....
4 comments:
The majority in AP has become self destructive and want to go back to the stage when no one knows about telugu or AP. This is the reason why people are supporting regionalism (without know what it is for) or someone because his father did something to state. People acquire certain talent (education, political survival etc) through experience and it cann't be passed through genetics. So people should stop believing in regionalism and heredity politics.
@11.30AM Everybody know the Telugu and AP true colors that's why supporting regionalism. If everybody treats every region as the same this won't happen but Andhra true colors showed every where and before AP formation and after AP formation.
@1:00PM,
There is no difference between your accusations and Nazi's accusing Jews for difficulties in Germany during 2nd world war.
People who male their own language and state as laughing stock are no different from the guys who talk bad about their loved ones.
There is no state of AP size in India with uniform development and therefore it is quite inappropriate to use under development as the basis for regionalism. In fact, Rayalaseema is the least developed in AP though majority of CMs, including the recent and most powerful CMs, come from that region. This indicate there is no logic in using under development and self rule as the reasons for current agitation in AP.
It is well known fact is that people who have no confidence in themselves blame others for their failures whether it make sense or not. The regional development depends on the local politicians if there are not good why you are supporting them just because they changed their party.
@1.41,
If there is no sense in regionalism, why did you people separate from Tamilnadu. If you say that it was formed on linguistic basis then that is biggest threat to indian union. No need to say, some one might ask separate country on linguistic basis in the future. So, per your logic, Seemandhra should go and merge back in Tamilnadu where as Telangana, Marathwada and some districts from karnataka would go back and form a hyderabad state which as it was. So, then there wouldn't be any regionalism...
kya dimak ka dahi karrehien reh..
do you have any sense and logic in your previous argument....don't give too much strain to your brain brother...have some discussion with your ex brothers i.e., tamilians while you are having some coffee or tea....
Post a Comment